DRS mistakes cost India big during the BGT 2bd Test.

The ongoing Border-Gavaskar Trophy is causing outrage. DRS has denied R. Ashwin's close dismissal of Mitchell Marsh. The incident left the Indian team frustrated and even lost the exam.

DRS controversy

During Day 2 of the 2nd event of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy in Adelaide delivery by Ravichandran Ashwin which appeared to trap Mitchell Marsh was denied by the DRS.

A controversial moment was witnessed during the Adelaide Test. The delivery thrown by R. Ashwin seemed to trap Mitchell Marsh. Ashwin immediately appealed the dismissal, which seemed confident.

Early replays and the Hawk-Eye system showed the pad being hit first by the ball, with no substantial inside edge, and heading towards the stumps. However, after several examinations,

Richard Kettleborough, the third umpire, said and could be heard in the media coverage: “No conclusive evidence to say whether it's bat or pad first with the evidence I've gotten.” This overturned the call on the field and no release. The decision was questioned by commentators and fans.

Matthew Hayden raised doubts about the accuracy of the system. Marsh was allowed to continue his innings, which left him Team India frustrated. Team India also lost a review.

Headlights and speedometer fail

The DRS incident is not the only one to spoil the day. Earlier, the game was briefly interrupted due to a projector malfunction.

This incident added to the chaos as incorrect readings were displayed by the speedometer. Additionally, it frustrated fans and viewers. These issues have sparked debates about the reliability of match technology and its role in high-stakes competitions like the Border-Gavaskar Trophy.

Gus Atkinson wins historic hat-trick and dominates New Zealand

DRS dilemma with KL Rahul

A DRS controversy also occurred during the first BGT test. During India's 23rd innings. Josh Hazelwood threw a ball through the stumps. This prompted KL Rahul play a defensive shot.

A loud appeal for a catch was made from behind, but the on-field umpire, Richard Illingworth, remained unmoved. Australia I immediately opted for DRS.

Replays showed 2 distinct sounds as the ball passed Rahul's bat. While Snicko showed a spike, it remained unclear whether the sound was caused by the ball grazing the bat or hitting the pad. Despite the uncertainty, the third umpire overturned the on-field decision and declared Rahul out.

Rahul's dismissal

During the 2nd test, a similar incident occurred with Mitchell Swamp. However, the decision favored the Australian side. This biased call sparked controversy among Indian fans and pundits.

Stay up to date with all the cricket action, follow Cricadium on WhatsApp, Facebook, Twitter, Telegram, And Instagram