Gary O'Neil defends place as Wolves supervisor regardless of defeat to West Ham as he additionally hits out in opposition to VAR | Soccer information

Wolves supervisor Gary O'Neil says he understands his personal followers' anger in the direction of him – however defended his file at Molineux after stress intensified following the defeat at West Ham.

Wolves suffered their third consecutive defeat on the London Stadium to stay within the relegation zone with 9 factors – and 4 extra secure.

Sky Sports activities Information reported final week that Wolves had carried out due diligence on numerous candidates in latest weeks, as stress mounted on O'Neil – who nonetheless believes he has the backing of the hierarchy regardless of poor kind.

“The folks above me assist me,” stated O'Neil, who joined the membership in August 2023. Aerial sports activities after the match. “However in fact the followers need their soccer membership to succeed.

“I perceive that they’re pointing the finger at me and that is my staff and I’ve to take duty for that, however after I got here to this soccer membership that they had simply taken over. [41] factors within the Premier League (earlier season).

“Since that second now we have managed to do £200m in participant gross sales. We’ve got offered an terrible lot of gamers in case you return to Ruben Neves, Joao Moutinho, Daniel Podence, Adama Traore, Raul Jimenez, Diego Costa, Pedro Neto and Max Kilman.

“After which we don't purchase now from this market, we search for others who’re for the long run and who might help us within the current.

“As we see within the Premier League, it's an unforgiving league. The squad is doing all the pieces they will to ship. However I'm actually pleased with them.

“I do know we solely have 9 factors and we’re in a tough scenario within the league, however they’re giving all the pieces. So I hope the followers are nonetheless pleased with the gamers, even when they hate the place we’re in we discover. They received. I don't hate it greater than I do. I'm there with them, whether or not they understand it or not.

“We is not going to hand over and we are going to proceed to assault. A giant sport in opposition to Ipswich is coming. And I hope that a few of the little components, our components, these of the officers might be helpful to us.”

Carragher: O'Neil isn't holding them again – I can't consider a greater supervisor

Aerial sports activities Jamie Carragher believes O'Neil isn’t the foundation of the issue at Wolves – and {that a} new supervisor received't freshen issues up at Molineux for the remainder of the season.

Carragher additionally sympathizes with O'Neil's argument that he’s coping with a much less skilled staff having offered many key gamers to greater golf equipment.

“It’s a bunch of gamers that we predict could be in and round these positions proper now,” Carragher stated. “Wolves' fear isn’t a lot about being within the backside three as the truth that there seems to be a 3 or 4 level hole between them and Leicester.

“You take a look at the three promoted groups – and all three promoted groups struggled final season – and also you assume it may be tough for Southampton this season, possibly even for Ipswich, however Leicester made the change, with Ruud van Nistelrooy getting 4 factors from the final two video games Will probably be on the minds of the Wolves hierarchy, there is no such thing as a doubt about it.

“I don't see a training change that will rejuvenate this entire staff or that Gary O'Neil is holding this staff again and they need to do extra – I don't actually see that.

“There are positively areas the place O'Neil will assume he must be higher. I take into consideration what he did final season and what he's doing now, in case you take a look at it as the entire work over the past 18 months, I feel he's carried out job for the Wolves.

“The place they’re now, I feel most individuals feared that final season. I don't assume it's a supervisor holding again a bunch that ought to be doing greater than what they're doing.”

O'Neil: We should always have had two penalties – and it's 'loopy' that West Ham's winner was left standing

O'Neil delivered one other blow to VAR – claiming West Ham's winner via Jarrod Bowen shouldn’t have been held because of a “flagrant” foul on Santi Bueno within the build-up.

As Wolves defended a free kick, Dinos Mavropanos challenged Bueno within the air, with the on-field referee making no mistake. Eleven seconds later, Mohammed Kudus allowed Bowen to calmly rating the winner.

VAR claimed it couldn’t return and penalize Bueno as a result of it was a brand new part of play – though there have been solely 11 seconds between the alleged foul and Bowen's shot crossing the road. line.

“That’s loopy,” O’Neil stated. “Santi Bueno goes to move the ball, so it's not related [that the VAR said it’s a new phase of play] as we might have cleared the ball.

“It's a flagrant foul on Santi Bueno and there's no method it's a special part. The ball remains to be in the identical space.

“They are going to discover causes, and naturally they’ll, and I perceive that there might be grey areas and that the wording of the rule could be interpreted in several methods. However this can be a blatant foul on Bueno within the seconds previous the aim. It’s a blatant foul.

Later in his press convention, O'Neil stated the Wolves ought to have been given two penalties within the second half. VAR monitored fouls by Emerson on Goncalo Guedes and Mavropanos on Jean-Ricner Bellegarde within the second half – however caught to the on-field determination of 'no penalty' every time.

“I perceive how tough the job is for the officers, however you want it to maneuver ahead,” added the Wolves coach. “There have been some actually massive calls there, however we couldn’t get via it.

“I don't assume Guedes is out of line. The contact positively continues within the field. Actually. I'll take a look at it and have an trustworthy dialog with them. [PGMOL].

“It's in all probability not clear and apparent, [Bellegarde]'s, however he tripped twice, I feel the on-field referee ought to give it, like the primary.

“I feel Guedes… Emerson can be on a yellow card, so that will have been an enormous turning level within the match.”

Wolves had been additional aggrieved when the nook for West Ham's first aim clearly got here from Hammers defender Aaron Wan-Bissaka – so it shouldn't have counted as effectively.

“Quite a lot of issues went in opposition to us,” O’Neil stated.