JK Rowling faces backlash after saying ‘There are not any trans kids’

Rowling is going through backlash because of his controversial views on transgender points, together with his latest claims that “there are not any trans youngsters.”

Because of her feedback, the writer discovered herself on the middle of one other social media storm months after being criticized for her feedback about boxer Imane Khelife.

Regardless of JK Rowling’s remarks, HBO has defended her position within the upcoming “Harry Potter” sequence, saying her artistic contribution was invaluable.

JK Rowling has confronted backlash in recent times because of her outspoken views on gender and ladies’s rights, and now the “Harry Potter” writer has as soon as once more sparked controversy together with her latest remarks, stating that “there are not any trans kids” and rejecting the concept people could be born within the improper physique.

In an article on within the improper physique.”

She added: “There are solely adults such as you, prepared to sacrifice the well being of minors to bolster your perception in an ideology that can in the end do extra hurt than lobotomies and false reminiscence syndrome mixed.”

Rowling’s assertion sparked a wave of reactions throughout X (previously Twitter).

Supporters thanked the writer for standing up for what they noticed because the welfare of youngsters, with one person writing: “‘Thanks for being a powerful voice in defending kids.”

One other commented: “Thanks for utilizing your voice and recognition to shine a lightweight on the reality and save kids from life-changing errors. »

Nevertheless, not everybody agrees with Rowling’s assertion, as a number of on the social media platform criticized her stance.

One critic sarcastically questioned his authority on the topic, commenting: “You’re additionally a medical professional.” I did not understand it. This factor the place everybody is known for one thing feels the necessity to act as an professional in one thing else…loopy!”

One other individual famous: “I did not understand my companion did not exist! I suppose she was by no means a trans child, significantly. What do you say to the many individuals who’ve transitioned extra younger and dwelling a cheerful life now?

One other individual stated: “I keep in mind listening to Margaret Thatcher say precisely that within the late 80s about gays and lesbians. What a method to make use of your voice and your platform. Have you ever ever considered truly caring about ladies? You aligned your self with a few of the worst misogynists as a substitute.

Earlier this 12 months, Rowling shared that former colleagues who had publicly distanced themselves from her over her views on transgender points had contacted her privately to “test that they have been nonetheless pals.”

The writer expressed opposition to phrases equivalent to “menstruators”, describing phrases and phrases equivalent to “cis” as being rooted in ideology.

Regardless of her controversial stance, Rowling beforehand stated she helps the transgender group. In response to the Day by day MailIn June 2020, she revealed that she “loves trans folks”, however famous that “erasing the idea of intercourse takes away the flexibility for a lot of to meaningfully talk about their lives”.

Nevertheless, since then, Rowling has solely develop into an increasing number of essential of trans folks and gender-affirming surgical procedures.

In August this 12 months, she sparked fury on-line after commenting on Algerian boxer Imane Khelife, who competed within the ladies’s 66kg (welterweight) boxing occasion on the 2024 Olympics and gained the gold medal. ‘gold.

Rowling got here below hearth after calling the boxer, who had beforehand been disqualified from one other competitors for failing to observe gender eligibility guidelines, “a person who is aware of he is being protected by a sporting institution misogynist”.

Khelife has since filed a criticism with French authorities, during which she named Rowling and Elon Musk for his or her alleged “acts of aggravated cyber-harassment.”

Final month, HBO supported Rowling after she confronted intense criticism over her views on transgender points.

The community has obtained quite a few complaints about Rowling’s position as government producer of the upcoming “Harry Potter” TV sequence.

In an announcement to Selectionthe channel responded: “We’re proud to as soon as once more inform the story of ‘Harry Potter’ – the heartwarming books that talk of the ability of friendship, willpower and acceptance. JK Rowling has the precise to precise his private opinions. We’ll stay targeted on the event of the brand new sequence, which may solely profit from his involvement.”

Regardless of HBO’s protection, the undertaking obtained blended reactions. Some followers criticized the variation as “pointless”, whereas others threatened to boycott the sequence over Rowling’s controversial remarks.

In an interview with News weekEvan Nierman, CEO of public relations agency Purple Banyan, spoke in regards to the worth of Warner Bros.’ help. Discovery, the father or mother firm of HBO, in help of Rowling.

He famous, “By publicly supporting JK Rowling, Warner Bros. is investing in a colossally artistic and profitable writer, as a substitute of taking a public stance on the controversial matter of transgender.”

In the meantime, cultural analyst and author Areej Shaikh recommended that even when Warner Bros.’ help. Discovery (WBD) to Rowling might mirror a shift in how firms strategy cancel tradition, it doesn’t imply a victory for Rowling within the broader cultural debate.

“This transfer signifies a shift in direction of extra public help for controversial figures when their artistic affect is valued, however it doesn’t essentially imply Rowling has ‘gained’ the tradition conflict,” she stated.

Shaikh additionally famous that the studio “appears to place the cultural and monetary historical past of the Harry Potter franchise forward of the divisive controversy” plaguing Rowling.

“This technique implies that as a substitute of taking clear positions, firms may now navigate cancel tradition with a larger emphasis on balancing public opinion and inventive contribution,” concluded the analyst.