Tax consultants accuse Starmer of ‘deceptive’ £3m farm tax declare

Keep knowledgeable with free updates

Merely register at UK tax myFT Digest – delivered straight to your inbox.

Tax consultants have questioned Sir Keir Starmer’s declare {that a} “typical household” farm would profit from a £3m exemption from inheritance tax.

They are saying the federal government’s figures are “deceptive” as a result of they require farmers to fulfill complicated situations, together with probably sharing possession of a farm within the occasion of the loss of life of 1 partner.

The Prime Minister has repeatedly used the determine to defend the controversial Funds determination to impose inheritance tax on agricultural property above £1 million, saying earlier this month that “the edge is 3 million of kilos sterling” in a “typical household case”.

“It isn’t essentially that the reported £3m determine is incorrect, it is that it is deceptive,” mentioned Emma Haley, authorized director at regulation agency Boodle Hatfield. “The problem is that there are completely different pitfalls that may restrict the allocation that everybody has.”

The £3 million determine is made up of a number of parts: £1 million in farm property reduction from April 2026; an exemption of £325,000 for all asset classes; and £175,000 for the switch of a home to kids or grandchildren.

This equates to £1.5 million which will be handed from a partner on to their kids. Each companions should cross on this sum to complete an exemption of £3 million.

However it means farms owned by a single particular person or single or civil partnership {couples} wouldn’t have the ability to attain the £3m allocation.

There are different components that additionally make securing a full £3m allocation troublesome.

The residential exemption is lowered if both accomplice’s share of the farm is value greater than £2 million and is eliminated at £2.35 million.

For a pair to achieve the £3 million allowance, the primary deceased partner would wish to go away £1 million of their property to somebody apart from their partner to keep away from the second partner’s property exceeding £2 million.

The result’s that farm possession would doubtless should be divided to qualify for the complete reduction.

“On the primary loss of life, you will have to ensure you cross the property to another person and they’ll then grow to be co-owners with the partner,” mentioned Haley at Boodle Hatfield. “It will get very difficult.”

Camilla Wallace, senior affiliate at Wedlake Bell, mentioned the £3 million determine was “most likely not sensible once you dig deeper” and calculated that £2.65 million was a extra doubtless quantity than giant farms can declare.

The Treasury declined to remark. The federal government mentioned the coverage, which applies to farms value greater than £1 million, would solely apply to round 1 / 4 of business household farms. However the Nationwide Farmers Union mentioned the true determine was three-quarters of farms.

Though a lot of the dialogue on reduction has targeted on farmers, the identical will apply to enterprise homeowners because the funds modified the principles for Enterprise Property Reduction (BPR) from the identical method as for the reduction of agricultural property. Household farms usually want to make use of each APR for his or her land and BPR for his or her livestock and equipment.

The Treasury has estimated that the adjustments to the APR and BPR would elevate a complete of £1.8 billion by 2029-30. Calculations by consultancy CBI Economics estimate that simply £387m of this determine would come from APR.